← Knowledge base

NSC (non-structural carbohydrates)

Macronutrients stored as g/kg 2 shared products have a value

What it is

NSC are the carbohydrates that don't form part of the plant's structure. The University of Tennessee lab calculates NSC as WSC plus starch [1]. A related figure, NFC (non-fibre carbohydrates), also includes pectin and fermentation acids, so check which one a report gives [1, 2].

Why it matters

Feeding a diet high in NSC over a long period has generally reduced insulin sensitivity compared with forage- or fat-rich diets, although the relationship is not straightforward [3]. For horses with insulin dysregulation, hay with low NSC (under 10%) is recommended to limit insulin responses [3]. Owners of horses with metabolic disorders commonly try to keep NSC below 10% [4].

Grains and cereal-based feeds, fruit, carrots, apples and treats should generally be left out of the diet of horses with equine metabolic syndrome because of their high NSC content [3].

Lowering NSC

Soaking hay for 7–16 hours at ambient temperature lowers water-soluble carbohydrates by 24–43%. In warm conditions, limit soaking to 1–2 hours because of microbial growth, and balance the minerals and vitamins that soaking leaches out [3].

Haylage produces a larger insulin response than hay with the same NSC content, so it is not recommended for horses with insulin dysregulation [3]. Cutting hay early and drying it quickly can help keep NSC down [4].

Reading it on a test

Hay tests report values both as fed and on a dry matter basis; compare feeds on the same basis [4, 2].

See also starch, sugar wsc, sugar esc, dry matter.

Sources

  1. 1. McIntosh D, Pedreira B, Mason K, Ivey J, Eckelkamp E, Shanks J, Florence R. Forage Analysis Definitions (SP 774). University of Tennessee Extension. Revised May 2025. https://soillab.tennessee.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/129/2025/05/SP-774_Forage_Analysis_Definitions-REV0525_Proof_1.pdf (accessed 2026-11-07)
  2. 2. Arispe S, Filley S. Understanding your forage test results (EM 8801). Oregon State University Extension Service. Revised October 2020, reviewed 2023. https://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/em-8801-understanding-your-forage-test-results (accessed 2026-11-07)
  3. 3. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies-Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I, Feige K, Fey K. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2019;33(2):335–349. doi:10.1111/jvim.15423 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6430910/ (accessed 2026-11-07)
  4. 4. A&L Canada Laboratories. Defining Analytical Constituents in Equine Feed Reports. Fact Sheet No. 234. London, Ontario. Revised February 2022. https://alcanada.com/Tech_Bulletins/Field_Crops/Forages/234-Defining%20Analytical%20Constituents%20in%20Equine%20Feed%20Report.pdf (accessed 2026-11-07)

Last edited 7 Nov 2026, 1:48 am